logo

News

Taxing Times: A Q&A with Stransact's Victor Athe on Nigeria's Tax Landscape

Stransact

Nigeria's tax landscape is constantly evolving, and keeping up with the latest changes can be a challenge for businesses of all sizes.  In a recent interview with The Punch newspaper, Victor Athe, Partner, Tax Services at Stransact (Chartered Accountants), offered valuable insights into the 2023 Finance Act and its impact on Nigerian businesses.

This interview with Victor Athe explores key topics such as foreign entity taxation, widening the tax base, and the challenges and opportunities businesses face in the current regulatory environment.

What is your structural assessment of the Finance Act 2023?

The Nigerian Companies Income Tax Act provides specific rules for the taxation of foreign entities engaged in international shipping and airline transportation in Nigeria.  The profits that these foreign entities specifically derive in Nigeria are typically subjected to tax using a deemed income approach, where the income tax rate is applied to a fair and reasonable percentage of their gross revenues.

The FA 2023 now requires that the gross revenue statements submitted by these foreign entities when filing their annual income tax returns have to be certified by an external auditor. The agencies that maintain regulatory oversight over shipping and air transport companies have also been mandated to ensure that these foreign companies present evidence of adequate tax compliance in Nigeria before they can get all relevant regulatory permits and approvals.

In my view, the additional requirements introduced by the FA 2023 would actually help ensure that the tax bases relating to the economic activities carried on by foreign entities in Nigeria are not eroded. This way, the country can reap its fair share of taxes from the enormous economic activities of these foreign businesses in Nigeria.

Debt service obligations in Nigeria now take up more than 60 percent of the nation’s tax income, and the country is turning back to the tax authority to ramp up revenue collection. How can the government maximise tax revenues?

Under the IMF’s Debt Sustainability Framework, a country’s debt-carrying or debt-accumulation capacity would typically be determined by the strength of its macroeconomic performance and policies. Studies have shown that the accumulation of debts above recommended threshold levels could be inimical to economic growth, especially when the debt increase does not align with the country’s growth needs.

A high public debt-to-GDP ratio can also further exacerbate the already deteriorating exchange rate in various ways, including putting pressure on foreign exchange reserves, investor confidence, inflationary pressures, and the need for more foreign currency to service debt obligations. This underscores the importance of sustainable fiscal management and prudent borrowing practices to maintain exchange rate stability and overall economic health.

The government should ramp up our tax revenue in our current context by widening the tax base. There are several steps that could be taken to achieve this, including the increased formalisation of the current vast informal sector in Nigeria.

On assumption of office, the current acting Federal Inland Revenue Service chairman also immediately expressed commitments to significantly improve the nation’s tax-to-GDP ratio from the then 10 percent to as much as 18 percent. There is clearly an inverse relationship between the public debt-to-GDP ratio and the tax-to-GDP ratio. This means that as the latter increases, the former is likely to reduce since it would directly mean that the government would have a larger pool of resources available to finance its expenditure priorities and would not need to borrow or cut down on its expenditure, to maintain fiscal stability.

Another measure that can be taken is the stringent implementation of some of the recent amendments to our tax laws, such as the Significant Economic Presence Rules.  There are currently cases of multinational enterprises deriving income from sales through digital/electronic channels to Nigerians (mostly B2B transactions) that are caught under our SEP rules but do not remit the appropriate share of income taxes to the government. Considering the significant earnings these MNEs derive in Nigeria, it may be an effective strategy to channel focus to collecting the appropriate level of taxes from these multinational businesses that are deriving enormous value from Nigeria.

 

Read More: Understanding the tax consequences of remote work

 

How can the government expand the country’s tax base so that more people share the tax burden?

It is certainly important for the Federal Government to work at expanding the tax base to capture a sizeable portion of the country’s vast informal sector, which mostly comprises unregistered small-scale businesses. This sector plays a crucial role in the nation’s economy, as it accounts for a significant portion of employment and national GDP—more than 50 percent.

Tax collection from the informal sector has remained a complex issue since the majority of the businesses therein largely operate without proper regulatory oversight. However, recent efforts by the government, which include the introduction of the Micro, Small, and Medium-sized Enterprises Development Fund, Ease of Doing Business reforms, and Tax Reforms, introduced by the amendments to our tax legislation, are all laudable steps aimed at encouraging the increased formalisation of the informal sector.

For companies, having a full-service consulting firm to support them is extremely valuable. What is the philosophy of Stransact Chartered Accountants and Audit in this regard?

Stransact currently offers a broad spectrum of professional services covering tax compliance/advisory services, all aspects of transfer pricing and its related services, transaction advisory, deal advisory, accounting, audit, and all other attest-type services. Our strategy for our target market is to provide these professional services to our clients with the same or a superior level of quality compared to what is offered by the big brands in the market. This way, we constantly help our clients derive strategic value from all their transactions that are significantly in excess of the costs to them.

 

Learn More: Download our services brochure

 

What is the implication of a low tax-to-GDP ratio on the growth of the Nigerian economy, and where are we compared to our peers in Africa?

There is evidence to support the fact that countries with high tax-to-GDP ratios have higher tax morale. Improving tax morale holds the potential to increase government revenue from taxation with relatively few enforcement efforts.

What do you think is holding back other states from addressing the issue of multiple taxation?

The Nigerian Constitution, the bedrock on which all other laws run, contains exclusive, concurrent, and residual legislative lists, each specifying the type of taxes that the various tiers of government in Nigeria should have legislative powers over. The debacle over whether the Federal or State governments should collect VAT is yet to be conclusively resolved due to the peculiar complications and complexities surrounding the issue.

The practice of coming up with different names for the same tax type by federal, state, and local government agencies and ministries is tantamount to tax duplication. Duplication, or multiplicity of taxes, is driven primarily by the need for states to generate more revenue. Despite the increase in statutory federal allocations to the states by about 69 percent in 2024 compared to the prior year, most states have not yet been able to independently fund the deficit of their respective budget expenditures.

The outcome of tax duplication is that taxpayers would have to bear a burden of taxes that is astronomically higher than what they had anticipated or planned. This huge disincentive for businesses in Nigeria contributes significantly to the poor ranking of Nigeria on the World Ease of Doing Business Index and weighs negatively on the investment climate in Nigeria. This also encourages tax touting, the creation of illegal taxes that are enforced and collected through illegal, aggressive, and unorthodox means that are mostly extortionate.

 

Read More: Forensic Audits: When and Why Your Business Needs One

 

How do you think things would develop in Nigeria if the Federal Government started taxing the wealthy in society and redistributing wealth democratically?

One of the major challenges bedeviling our revenue system is that a lot of high net-worth individuals are either outrightly evading payment of taxes from some or all sources of their income or do not pay the appropriate level of taxes commensurate to their income in line with the provisions of our income tax laws.

For instance, the Personal Income Tax Act, which governs the taxation of individuals in Nigeria, stipulates that every individual who is a Nigerian resident should be assessed PIT on their global income (i.e., income earned from both within and outside Nigeria). The proper enforcement of this provision alone can change Nigeria’s revenue fortunes very significantly.

One of the cardinal features of a proper/effective tax system is the redistribution of wealth. This is why the PIT rates in Nigeria have graduated so that the highest income earners are taxed at the highest rate. However, where there is a paucity of data on the actual income earned by high net-worth persons, who may have exploited a large part of our collective economic resources in generating such income, then the Nigerian economy will constantly be short-changed, where an effective system is not put in place to hold these individuals accountable to remit their fair share of taxes.

What kind of policy should be in place for there to be harmonisation of taxation?

Our National Tax Policy document was created sometime in 2012 and then revised in 2017, to provide policy direction for tax matters generally. This also serves as a procedural guideline for achieving effective harmonisation between the respective tax authorities of the different tiers of government. The NTP was designed to be an instrument for creating awareness of the importance of taxation as a stable flow of revenue for the government in the face of dwindling oil revenue. The NTP sought to address fundamental issues relating to multiple taxation, a lack of accountability for tax revenue, and a lack of clarity on the taxation powers of each level of government.

However, considering the fact that the NTP is only a document that is not a legal instrument, the intended benefits are yet to be realised, due to a lack of effectiveness in its implementation, perhaps because it lacks legal backing.

 

Download our Doing Business in Nigeria Guide

 

The lower court says VAT is strictly a state tax. If the Supreme and Appeals Courts affirm that decision, it will leave the FG open to revenue shortfalls. What do you think?

One of the challenges Nigeria is currently facing is that the indices that drive the allocation of revenue accruing to the government centrally do not effectively consider and reward contributions to the economy from arms of government that demonstrate effective utilisation of resources, promotion of investments, infrastructural development, and others.

What are the major challenges and opportunities for businesses regarding taxation in the current economic and regulatory landscape?

There are undoubtedly a plethora of challenges in Nigeria’s current economic and regulatory landscape as it relates to taxation. These include the multiplicity of taxes, poor tax administration, non-availability of the database, tax touting, ambiguity of Nigerian tax laws, non-payment of tax refunds, issues around the utilisation of withholding tax credit notes, and wrong interpretation of tax laws during tax dispute resolutions, among others.  Most of these issues generally result in low tax morale among taxpayers. Recent studies have shown that a key determinant of tax morale is the perceived quality of the tax administration. An increase in tax morale has also been linked to satisfaction with public services, supporting the existence of the fiscal contract between taxpayers and the state’s willingness to pay tax in return for effective public services.

Notwithstanding the existing challenges, there are lots of tax incentives that have been structured to encourage increased investments in the Nigerian economy.

 

Source: The Punch

Related Articles